• Log In
  • New issue alert
  • Submit a manuscript
  • Register
  • Home
  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Search
  • Archives
  • Current
  • Forthcoming

Share

Article Panel


Vol 16, No 3 (2013)
»Table of Contents
Reading Tools
  • About the author
  • How to cite this article
  • Indexing metadata
  • Print version
  • Look up terms
  • Finding References
  • Review policy

Related items
  • Author's work


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International.
Biotechnological processes for chitin recovery out of crustacean waste: A mini-review | Gortari | Electronic Journal of Biotechnology
doi: 10.2225/vol16-issue3-fulltext-10
Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, Vol 16, No 3 (2013)

Biotechnological processes for chitin recovery out of crustacean waste: A mini-review

María Cecilia Gortari, Roque Alberto Hours



Abstract

Background: Chitin is an important natural resource. The annual worldwide production is estimated in approximately 1010-1012 ton. It is produced by arthropods (insects and crustaceans), molluscs and fungi. Its main biological function is structural. Crustacean shells are the most important chitin source for commercial use due to its high content and ready availability. Chitin and its derivatives have great economical value because of their numerous applications: food, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, textile industries, waste water treatment and agriculture. In nature, chitin is closely associated with proteins, minerals, lipid and pigments, which have to be removed.

Results: Several techniques to extract chitin from different sources have been reported. The most common method for recovery of chitin from crustacean shells is the chemical procedure. It involves two mayor steps: elimination of inorganic matter (demineralization) and extraction of protein matter (deproteination) using strong acids and bases. However, these processes may cause depolymerization affecting the polymer properties such as molecular weight, viscosity and degree of acetylation. In addition, the chemical purification of chitin is hazardous, energy consuming and threatening to the environment. As an alternative to the chemical process, different biological processes have been investigated: microbiological fermentation and methodologies using enzymatic crude extracts or isolated enzymes.

Conclusions: The results reported are extremely variable; however, they offer new perspectives for the production of chitin with the concomitant reduction of the environmental impact.




Full Text: | Full Text | Reprint PDF | HTML

ISSN:  0717-3458

Contact: edbiotec@pucv.cl

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso
Av. Brasil 2950, Valparaíso, Chile
Copyright © 1997- 2022 by Electronic Journal of Biotechnology