• Log In
  • New issue alert
  • Submit a manuscript
  • Register
  • Home
  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Search
  • Archives
  • Current
  • Forthcoming

Share

Article Panel


Vol 18, No 3 (2015)
»Table of Contents
Reading Tools
  • About the author
  • How to cite this article
  • Indexing metadata
  • Print version
  • Look up terms
  • Finding References
  • Review policy

Related items
  • Author's work


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International.
Clonal diversity and antimicrobial resistance of Enterococcus faecalis isolated from endodontic infections | Suliman Al-Badah | Electronic Journal of Biotechnology
doi:10.1016/j.ejbt.2015.03.004
Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, Vol 18, No 3 (2015)

Clonal diversity and antimicrobial resistance of Enterococcus faecalis isolated from endodontic infections

Abdulhakim Suliman Al-Badah, Abdelnasser S.S. Ibrahim, Ali A. Al-Salamah, Shebl Salah S. Ibrahim



Abstract

Background: Enterococcus faecalis is considered to be one of most prevalent species in the oral cavity, particularly in endodontic infections. The aim of the present study was to investigate the prevalence in dental root canals, clonal diversity by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD-PCR) analysis, and the antibiotic susceptibility of E. faecalis isolates.

Results: Among the bacterial strains isolated from dental root canal specimens (n=82), E. faecalis was determined to have the highest prevalence followed by Streptococcus viridians, Leuconostoc mesenteroides, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mitis, and Pediococcus pentosaceus. Cluster analysis of RAPD-PCR and RFLP patterns of the E. faecalis isolates discriminated five and six different genotypes, respectively. Among the tested strains, 43%, 52% and 5% were susceptible, intermediate resistant, and resistant to erythromycin, respectively. In addition, one strain (E-12) was intermediate resistant to linezolid, and one isolate (E-16) was resistant to tetracycline. Interestingly, many of the intermediate resistant/resistant strains were grouped in clusters 5 and 6 according RAPD and to RFLP, respectively.

Conclusions: E. faecalis demonstrated the highest prevalence in the tested dental root canals specimens collected from Saudi patients and were grouped into five to six different genotypes. Different levels of antimicrobial susceptibility were observed in the tested E. faecalis strains, which clearly indicated that although bacterial strains may be similar, point mutations can result in extreme susceptibility or resistance to various antibiotics. This phenomenon is a cause for concern for clinicians in the treatment of dental infections caused by E. faecalis.




Full Text: | Reprint PDF | HTML

ISSN:  0717-3458

Contact: edbiotec@pucv.cl

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso
Av. Brasil 2950, Valparaíso, Chile
Copyright © 1997- 2023 by Electronic Journal of Biotechnology