Biotechnology Industry |
|
Environmental Biotechnology |
Electronic Journal of Biotechnology ISSN: 0717-3458 |
Vol. 10 No. 3, Issue of July 15, 2007 |
© 2007 by Pontificia Universidad Católica
de Valparaíso -- Chile |
Received June 6,
2006 / Accepted March 5, 2007 |
DOI: 10.2225/vol10-issue3-fulltext-7 |
|
Effect of temperature on the anaerobic
digestion of palm oil mill effluent
Wanna
Choorit*
Biotechnology
Program
School of Agricultural Technology
Walailak University
Tasala, Nakhonsithammarat 80160 Thailand
Tel: 667 567 2355
Fax: 667 567 2302
E-mail: cwanna@wu.ac.th
Pornpan
Wisarnwan
Biotechnology
Program
School of Agricultural Technology
Walailak University
Tasala, Nakhonsithammarat 80160 Thailand
Tel: 667 567 2303
Fax: 667 567 2302
E-mail: rombiot@hotmail.com
*Corresponding
author
Financial
support:
Walailak University
and the Southern Palm (1978) Co., Ltd.
Keywords:
hydraulic retention times, mesophilic reactor, methane, organic
loading rate, temperature variations, thermophilic reactor, volatile
fatty acids.
Abbreviations: |
BOD:
biochemical oxygen demand
COD: chemical oxygen demand
CSTRs: continuous stirred tank reactors
HRT: hydraulic retention time
OLRs: organic loading rates
POME: palm oil mill effluent
TKN: total Kjeldahl nitrogen
TS: total solid
TSS: total suspended solid
TVFA: total volatile fatty acid
UASFF: up-flow anaerobic sludge fixed film
|
Two
continuous stirred tank reactors (CSTRs) each fed with palm oil mill
effluent (POME), operated at 37ºC and 55ºC, respectively, were investigated
for their performance under varies organic loading rates (OLRs). The
37ºC
reactor operated successfully at a maximum OLR of 12.25 g[COD]/L/day
and a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 7 days. The 55ºC reactor operated successfully
at the higher loading rate of 17.01 g[COD]/L/day and had a HRT of
5 days. The 37ºC
reactor achieved a 71.10% reduction of chemical oxygen demand (COD),
a biogas production rate of 3.73
L of gas/L[reactor]/day containing 71.04% methane,
whereas the 55ºC reactor achieved a 70.32% reduction
of COD, a biogas production rate of 4.66 L of gas/L[reactor]/day containing
69.53% methane. An OLR of 9.68 g[COD]/L/day, at a HRT of 7 days, was
used to study the effects of changing the temperature by 3ºC increments. The reactor processes
were reasonably stable during the increase from 37ºC to 43ºC and the decrease from 55ºC
to 43ºC.
When the temperature was increased from 37ºC
to 46ºC,
the total volatile fatty acid (TVFA) concentration and biogas production
was 2,059 mg as acetic acid/L and 1.49 L of gas/L[reactor]/day at day 56,
respectively. When the temperature was reduced from 55ºC to 40ºC, the TVFA concentration and
biogas production was 2,368 mg as acetic acid/L and 2.01 L of gas/L[reactor]/day at day 102,
respectively. By first reducing the OLR to 4.20 g[COD]/L/day then
slowly increasing the OLR back to 9.68 g[COD]/L/day, both reactors
were restored to stable conditions at 49ºC
and 37ºC
respectively. The initial 37ºC
reactor became fully acclimatized at 55ºC
with an efficiency similar to that when operated at the initial 37ºC
whereas the 55ºC
reactor also achieved stability at 37ºC
but with a lower efficiency.
Anaerobic
digestion is considered to be an effective treatment process for palm oil mill effluent (POME). This involves a consortium of microorganisms
catalysing a complex series of biochemical reactions that mineralise
organic matter producing methane and carbon dioxide. The key factors
to successfully control the stability and efficiency of the process
are reactor configurations, hydraulic retention time (HRT), organic loading rates (OLR), pH,
temperature, inhibitor concentrations, concentrations of total volatile fatty acid (TVFA) and substrate composition. In order to avoid a process
failure and/or low efficiency, these parameters require an investigation
so that they can be maintained at or near to optimum conditions.
Generally,
these anaerobic digestions are conducted at either mesophilic (30-37ºC) or thermophilic (50-60ºC)
temperatures. In a palm oil mill processing system, the wastewater
is discharged at relatively high temperatures (80-90ºC) (Najafpour et
al. 2006), making it feasible to treat the POME at either mesophilic
or thermophilic temperatures. With POME added at an OLR of 12.6 g[COD]/L/day
and a HRT of 5.6 days under mesophilic temperature, Cail
and Barford (1985) using a semi-continuous anaerobic reactor achieved
a chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal of around 75%. Using a similar
configuration, of a semi-continuous anaerobic reactor, but operating
with thermophilic conditions and a maximum OLR of 15.1 g[COD]/L/day
and a HRT of 4.3 days they achieved a COD removal of 85%, and a methane
yield of 295 ml/g[COD] (Padilla and Banks, 1993).
Using up flow reactors degrading synthetic wastewater of different
OLRs, Yu et al. (2002), found that the operation
at 55ºC achieved a higher substrate
degradation rate, biogas production rate, and specific rate of aqueous
product formation than when operated at 37ºC. de la Rubia
et al. (2002) concluded that a reactor operating at a lower HRT
and 55ºC produced more gas than at 35ºC
with OLR's of up to 2.19
kg m-3 d-3 COD. The digestion
of a distillery waste at anaerobic digestion temperatures ranging
from 35-55ºC, gave a maximum total biogas
and methane yield at a digester temperature of 50ºC (Banerjee and
Biswas, 2004). According to these data, temperature is an important
parameter that modifies the effectiveness of the anaerobic bacterial
consortium to produce methane from organic matter.
In
practice, failure to control temperature increases can result in biomass
washout with a resulting accumulation of TVFAs (Lau
and Fang, 1997). Any sudden change in temperature caused a lowering
of COD reduction, biogas production and coincided with an accumulation
of TVFAs in both a mesophilic (35ºC)
and a thermophilic (55ºC)
up flow anaerobic filter, treating a simulated papermill wastewater
(Ahn and Forster, 2002). Daily upward temperature
fluctuations affected the maximum specific methanogenic activity more
severely than did a daily imposed downward temperature fluctuation
(El-Mashad et al. 2004). Because of this information,
together with the high temperature of POME and the variation of the
POME wastewater volumes during high and low seasons, we have investigated
the performance of a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) operating
in a steady state at both 37ºC
and 55ºC
and the effects of variations of OLRs and temperatures shifts on the
performance of reactors operating at a relatively low OLR level.
POME
characterization
Fresh
POME was collected monthly from a conventional palm oil mill factory
located in Surat-thani province, Thailand.
After the determination of its physico-chemical properties, the wastewater
was stored in a sealed container and kept in a cold room at 4ºC until used.
Equipment
The
CSTR reactors used have a 12
cm internal diameter with a height of 27 cm. The reactors were maintained at
the constant desired temperature using hot water circulation around
the reactors. Feed was pumped semi-continuously through the feeding
hole, (5 mm
in diameter), near the bottom by means of a peristaltic pump. Samples
were withdrawn from sampling holes (5
mm in diameter) located 1, 8 and 15
cm from the bottom. Mixing was achieved by stirring
the medium at 70 rpm with a magnetic bar (0.8 x 5 cm).
Inoculum
A
conventional POME treatment pond with an area of 110 x 191
m2, and 4
m in depth was fed with an OLR of 0.5-1.5 kg[COD]/L/day
with a residence time of 20-30 days. The inoculum sludge for seeding
the reactors was brought from this site and adapted with diluted POME
(POME:tap water = 1:4 v/v) for 7-10 days at the desired temperature,
and then inoculated into the digesters with an initial total solid
(TS) and volatile suspended solid (VSS) of around 35-37 and 15-16
g/L, respectively.
Effects
of varying OLRs on the performance of the reactors
Two
CSTRs each with a 1.6-L working volume were fed with acclimatized
POME. One reactor was controlled at a temperature of 37ºC
(mesophilic reactor) and the other at 55ºC (thermophilic reactor). The
COD of the POME was adjusted to the desired value with tap water.
The various OLRs were achieved at a HRT of 7 days for the 37ºC reactor and 5 days for the
55ºC
reactor. The physico-chemical characteristics of the effluent used
in this section are shown in Table 1 (2nd
sample).
Effect
of temperature shifts on the performance of the reactors
Temperatures
were changed in both reactors while being operated at a HRT of 7 days
(OLR 9.68 g[COD]/L/day). The temperature of the 37ºC reactor was increased up to
55ºC
gradually by 3ºC
at a time, while the temperature of the 55ºC
reactor was decreased until it reached 37ºC again by 3ºC at a time. After each temperature
change the reactor was left at the new temperature until a steady
state was achieved. This took at least 2 weeks and sometimes longer
before the next temperature shift. The 37ºC reactor was operated at 37,
40, 43, 46, 49, 52 and 55ºC
for 14, 15, 15, 33, 31, 22 and 16 days, respectively. The 55ºC
reactor was operated at 55, 52, 49, 46, 43, 40 and 37ºC for 14, 17, 16, 17, 27, 29
and 27 days, respectively. After the 37ºC and 55ºC reactors were operated at 46ºC
and 40ºC,
respectively a major loss of steady state as indicated from the increase
in TVFA and the decreasing biogas production. The OLR was reduced
to try to stabilize the system, then, gradually increased to the normal
working OLR to achieve a new steady state. Physico-chemical characteristics
of the effluent used in this section are shown in Table
1 (3rd sample).
It
was considered that a steady-state had been achieved when the levels
of TVFA, COD removal, biogas production rate and composition varied
by less than 3% on three consecutive days (Borja et al.
1996). The values shown in Table 2, Table
4 and Table 5 were the average values obtained
after measuring the given parameters for a 2 week period of that steady-state.
Chemical
analyses
Gas
volume was measured by using a displacement of acidified water (pH
2-3) and methane by KOH solution displacement in a serum bottle, as
described previously (Ergüder et al. 2001). Alkalinity
was measured by the direct titration method (Jenkins
et al. 1983). Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), COD, TVFA, pH,
TS, total suspended solid (TSS), total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), NH3-N
and oil and grease were determined in triplicate according to standard
methods (Clescerl et al. 1998).
Data
analysis
Means
± SD of pH, TVFA, alkalinity, TVFA/alkalinity, biogas and methane
productions, biogas and methane yields and COD removal were calculated
from data to be collected from the reactors operated under steady
state (14 days) under variation of OLRs and temperature shifts. These
data were subjected to statistical analyses using SPSS program version
10. Completely randomized design was employed for analysis of variance
(ANOVA). The difference between means was evaluated by using Duncan's
multiple range test. P < 0.05 was considered as significant.
Characteristics
of POME
The
physico-chemical parameters of POME used in this study (Table
1) were very different from those previously reported (Ahmad
et al. 2003; Najafpour et al. 2006). This is
due to a change in the mill operation. For example, a much smaller
water volume was used to remove the majority of the suspended material
from the lipids. This allowed for a considerable reduction in the
amount of wastewater generated in the process, and consequently a
higher content of organic and inorganic matter. Since the COD/BOD
ratio of POME is about 1.56 a good possibility exists that the
organic matter is biodegradable (Raj and Anjaneyulu,
2005). The main recalcitrant organic material found in POME was
lignocellulose (Oswal et al. 2002). The large amounts
of identified biodegradable components were oil and grease, which
can be hydrolyzed by microorganisms to fatty acids. Some of these
fatty acids are potential substrates for methane production which
does allow a favourable economic outcome (Angelidaki
et al. 1990). In contrast, the lipid-rich waste contains long
chain fatty acids, especially palmitate (higher than 50 mg/gdry
weight) and oleate (higher than 200 mg/L), that were hydrolysis
products of fat & oil and these have been reported to inhibit
bacterial growth and methane formation (Cirne et al.
2007). The high amounts of TS and TSS in the POME comes from insoluble
organic substances being washed out during the production process.
It has to be emphasized that the up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket
process appears to be particularly sensitive to the loading of solids.
Thus Borja et al. (1996) used a two-stage up-flow
anaerobic sludge blanket for treating POME. As soon as the suspended
solids concentration of POME in the acidogenic reactor was increased
to 10.8 g/L, an accumulation of organic solids in the reactor was
observed.
Effects
of varying OLRs on the performance of the reactors
Reactor
performance is usually evaluated in terms of stability and efficiency
of the process estimated through the measurement of pH, TVFA and alkalinity,
COD removal, gas production and methane production (Table
2). For the 37ºC reactor, as the OLR was increased
from 9.72 to 12.25 g[COD]/L/day, the pH was significantly [p
< 0.05] reduced from 7.54 to 7.42 with a significant
[p < 0.05] increase of TVFA from 172.29 to
815.43 mg acetic acid/L. At an OLR of 12.25 g[COD]/L/day, the ratio
of TVFA/alkalinity was 0.26. Zinatizadeh et al. (2006)
demonstrated that treating POME in an up-flow anaerobic sludge fixed
film (UASFF) reactor at 38ºC,
with OLRs of 14.49, 21.31, 26.21 and 34.73 g[COD]/L/day with a HRT
of 1 day, the TVFA concentration increased to 93.5, 165.1, 365.2 and
843.2 mg/L respectively. This implied an increasing unbalance between
acid formation and methane production in the system. However under
the conditions of this experiment, the pH of the effluent (7.42) was
in the optimal range (6.9-7.9) for anaerobic digestion, far from a
pH of 5.3, known to decrease methane concentration by about 59% (Björnsson
et al. 2000). Also Song et al. (2004) reported
that the buffering capacity was sufficient when the TVFA/alkalinity
was maintained below 0.4.
The
pH values in the 55ºC
reactor were significantly [p < 0.05] higher
than those in the 37ºC reactor at all OLRs tested
(Table 2). However, the ranges of pH values
were all within the optimal pH values for methane production (Wheatley,
1990). At an HRT of 7 days and an OLR increasing from 9.62 to 12.15
g[COD]/L/day, the levels of TVFAs in the 55ºC
reactor increased from 270.14 to 537.14 mg acetic acid/L, with the
TVFA/alkalinity ratio changing only between 0.09-0.17 compared to
a change from 0.06 to 0.26 at 37ºC
using the same loadings and HRT. These results imply that at the same
level of OLR, the process in the 55ºC reactor was more stable than
in the 37ºC
reactor. Increasing the OLR in the 55ºC
reactor to 17.01 g[COD]/L/day with an HRT of 5 days, caused a significant
[p < 0.05] increase of the TVFA/alkalinity
ratio to 0.30 and therefore this system was under severe stress.
The
efficiency of COD reduction was between 69.89-71.10% at OLRs from
9.72-12.25 g[COD]/L/day for the 37ºC
reactor with a methane yield of 0.46-0.51 L/g[COD] and methane production
was 1.96-2.65 L/L[reactor]/day. The 55ºC reactor gave a COD reduction
of between 67.73-72.16%, a methane yield of 0.44-0.49 L/g[COD] and
methane production was 1.91-3.24 L/L[reactor]/day. The biogas and
methane productions of both reactors significantly [p <
0.05] increased with an increasing OLR (Table
2).
As
far as the performance of the process is concerned, the 37ºC reactor ran successfully at
the maximum OLR tested (12.25 g[COD]/L/day) and an HRT of 7 days.
At an HRT of 5 days, the 55ºC reactor also ran successfully
at the maximum OLR tested (17.01 g[COD]/L/day). In both these cases,
although the TVFA levels were significantly [p <
0.05] raised to 815.43 and 980.00 mg acetic acid/L, respectively;
the reduction of % COD was still high and a significant increase in
the production of biogas and methane occurred. This work showed that
the capital cost of the anaerobic digester could be lowered by operating
the reactor at a thermophilic temperature. Borja and
Banks (1995) reported that changing the type of reactor also affected
OLRs; for example, using an anaerobic filter or a fluidized-bed reactor
or an UASFF reactor, each had its own characteristics (Zinatizadeh
et al. 2006). However, these reactor types did not work well with
wastewater of high solid content (Björnsson et al. 1997).
Thermophilic digestion is now becoming of great interest for sewage
sludge treatment due to its potential for a better reduction of potential
pathogens compared to that using mesophilic digestion (Bousková
et al. 2005). Since POME has an initial temperature of 80-90ºC (Najafpour et
al. 2006), operating the reactor under thermophilic conditions
would be more economical than under mesophilic conditions in terms
of the ability to use a smaller digester and obtaining a better methane
production rate (Table 2).
Effect
of temperature shifts on the performance of the reactors
The
responses of the performance of the processes to changes in temperature
were investigated in the 37 and 55ºC
reactors at an HRT of 7 days and an OLR of 9.68 g[COD]/L/day. The
performance of both reactors was divided into three phases (Table
3).
Phase
I. After changing the temperature, only minor changes in the operating
processes were observed in phase I with either reactor. The performance
of the mesophilic reactor is shown in Figure 1
and the thermophilic reactor in Figure 2. The
results illustrate that the performanceof the 37ºC
reactor changed insignificantly in terms of any of the measured parameters
as the temperature was raised to 40ºC
and 43ºC.
These results were confirmed by statistic tests which showed that
the levels of TVFA, alkalinity, biogas and methane productions and
methane yield did not significantly [p < 0.05] change (Table 4). For example, the TVFA levels
ranged from 160.71-166.64 mg as acetic acid/L and biogas production
was 2.79-2.81 L
of gas/L[reactor]/day (Table 4). The 55ºC reactor, operated over the
reducing temperature range of 52ºC,
49ºC
and 46ºC
also produced only minor changes in efficiency. The biogas production
varied from 2.67-2.72 L of gas/L[reactor]/day and methane
production ranged from 1.86-1.89 L/L[reactor]/day. However when the
temperature was reduced from 46 to 43ºC
the efficiency of the process became lower with a significant [p
< 0.05] drop in methane (1.77 L/L[reactor]/day) and
biogas productions (2.53 L
of gas/L[reactor]/day) (Table 5). The process
became unstable with a significant increase in TVFA levels (746.14
mg as acetic acid/L). Moreover, at each 3ºC
temperature shift from 55ºC
to 52ºC,
49ºC,
46ºC
and 43ºC
there was a rapid initial drop in biogas production rate that was
quickly reversed over a few days (Figure 2).
These results indicated that the 55ºC
reactor was quite sensitive to the temperature disturbances, probably
due to induction of a temporary unbalance of the microorganisms in
the reactor. Speece (1996) reported that methanogens
are more sensitive to temperature changes than acidogens. It maybe
that the rate at which the methanogens converted the fatty acids to
methane was initially reduced far more than the rate at which the
acidogens produced acids.
As
shown in Table 5, the pH in the 55ºC
reactor (operating in the steady state at 55, 52, 49, 46 and with
slightly changed parameters at 43ºC)
were in the range of 7.60-7.78. The higher pH levels (7.78-7.76) occurring
in the 55-49ºC
reactor were in agreement with results from a previous study (de
la Rubia et al. 2002). The alkalinity levels of the 55ºC
reactor were also higher than those of the 37ºC
reactor (Table 4), thus an increase of TVFA
levels in the 55ºC reactor was compensated by
an increased alkalinity. This allowed neutralization of the TVFA and
prevented a pH drop (Borja et al. 1995). In addition,
the process is considered to be operating effectively as TVFA/alkalinity
ratios between 0.05-0.06 (Table 4) and 0.08-0.09
(Table 5), are still some way from the failure
limit of 0.3-0.4 (Rittmann and McCarty, 2001).
In
addition, temperature shifts of the 55ºC reactor to 52, 49 and 46ºC
and for the 37ºC
to 40 and 43ºC
had no detrimental effect on reactor performance with the COD removal
efficiencies remaining about 68% in both reactors. Also the methane
production and yields did not vary significantly at these different
temperatures. It seems therefore that temperature shifts do not directly
affect the gas composition (Table 4
and Table 5). From these results, we can
conclude that the microorganisms present in these reactors must have
a tolerance for a fairly wide range of temperatures. This may be attributed
to the presence of thermotolerant organisms that can quickly adapt
to any newly imposed temperature change. Chen (1983)
reported that the development of a bacterial community involved in
the degradative system could be related to the percentage of mesophilic
and thermophilic bacteria in the initial sludge. Iranpour
et al. (2002) have also suggested that an upward temperature shift
may lead to the development of a culture dominated by thermotolerant
mesophilic organism rather than true thermophiles.
Moreover,
both reactors could be operated successfully at 43ºC, which is considered to be
the optimal change-over temperature from mesophiles to thermophiles.
Phase
II. In phase II a temperature shift of 3ºC
did cause a loss of stability and a change in the performance of the
reactors. This was clearly observed when the 37ºC reactor temperature was raised
from 43ºC
to 46ºC
and for the 55ºC
reactor, the temperature was lowered from 43ºC
to 40ºC.
Process instability was observed as TVFA concentrations rapidly increased
from 156 to 2,059 over the first 13 days after the change from 43ºC
to 46ºC
and from 750 to 2,368 over the first 12 days from 43ºC
to 40ºC.
This indicated a significant change in the balance among the microbial
groups involved in the system. It is unlikely that such temperature
changes occur in the normal operating environment of the methanogenic
sludge. During these periods of operation the performance of the processes
were poor with the biogas production rates dropping to a minimum value
(1.49 L of gas/L[reactor]/day for the
37ºC
reactor and 2.01 L
of gas/L[reactor]/day for the 55ºC
reactor). Perhaps a consortium adapted to operate at 37ºC
ceases to function effectively at 46ºC
while a consortium adapted to operate at 55ºC ceases to operate effectively
at 40ºC.
Griffin et al. (1998) reported that the methanogenic
bacteria are the limiting microbial group during the period of adaptation
to thermophilic conditions. Bousková et al. (2005)
also observed a strong disturbance when the reactor temperature was
adjusted from 42ºC
to 47ºC.
In particular, the optimal growth rate of any particular bacterial
strain occurs over a limited temperature range. Once this temperature
range is exceeded, growth rate drops off rapidly due to denaturation
of key proteins (Rittmann and McCarty, 2001). The
loss of function of any one of the microbes involved in the degradative
system will alter the overall process.
Since,
the unstable conditions of both reactors were most clearly shown in
the changes in TVFA levels, the OLR of the reactors was lowered in
an attempt to restore an effective process. Decreasing the OLR from
9.68 to 4.20 g[COD]/L/day during the transition period resulted in
a significant drop in the TVFA levels in both reactors to 532 mg as
acetic acid/L (37ºC reactor) and 665 mg as acetic
acid/L (55ºC
reactor) and the process stabilized. However, when the OLRs were again
increased to 9.68 g[COD]/L/day between days 67-76 (37ºC reactor) and days 111-119 (55ºC
reactor) the performance was again reduced as shown by a marked continued
rise in TVFA to 2,459 for the 37ºC
and 2,198 for the 55ºC reactor and a concomitant decline
in biogas production.
The
responses of pH, alkalinity, reduction of COD, and methane content
were somewhat delayed after the instability developed (data not shown).
However, the increased TVFA was not accompanied by a corresponding
increase in alkalinity so the pH fell during this period.
Phase
III. In an attempt to recover the reactor performance after the
onset of the unstable transient conditions in phase II, both reactors
were fed with a decreased OLR (4.20) followed by a gradual increase
(to 9.68) over a period of time to allow for any adaptation of the
microbial populations. This readjustment occurred during days 77-93
for the 37ºC
reactor and from 120-132 for the 55ºC
reactor and during this time the temperature was altered again to
49ºC and 37ºC
for the 37ºC and 55ºC
reactors, respectively. The 37ºC
reactor became stabilized again at 49ºC
after about day 93 with a substantial drop in TVFA levels to 338.71
mg (as acetic acid/L). The 55ºC
became stabilized at 37ºC at about day 130 with a TVFA
level of 851.29 mg as acetic acid/L. Both these new TVFA levels were
significantly [p < 0.05] higher than those
of the steady state in phase I, especially with the 55ºC
reactor (Table 4 and Table
5). This data revealed that the bacterial consortium and in particular
the methanogens, in both digesters were able to adapt to new conditions
of temperature and OLR and achieve a new steady-state. Once methanogenesis
had recovered, a relatively stable environmental condition could be
maintained in the system.
The
adaptation of the mesophilic population operating at 37ºC to thermophilic conditions
at 55ºC
led to a stable process that is significantly different from that
previously found at 37ºC
(Table 4) and was different from the performance
of the initial 55ºC
reactor (Table 5). This new process allows for
a conversion of organic matter into the final end-product without
accumulation of intermediates. This could be attributed to the rapid
development of thermophilic methanogens, that were originally present
in the mesophilic sludge, to become dominant under the new thermophilic
conditions (Chachkhiani et al. 2004). In contrast
when the 55ºC
reactor was shifted to a temperature of 37ºC
and the new set of stable conditions were established from days 132
onwards, these properties were different from those of either the
initial properties of the 37ºC
or 55ºC
reactors (Table 5). A reduced amount of biogas
production coincided with a significantly [p < 0.05]
higher TVFA level (851.29 mg as acetic acid/L) even at day 146, when
the experiment was terminated. This indicates that the new microbial
consortium is probably different from that operating initially in
the 37ºC reactor and results in a population
that is less efficient in terms of % COD removal, biogas and methane
productions. This could be related to the poor development of mesophiles
that should become dominant under the new mesophilic conditions. The
results indicate that the microbial population present in the 55ºC reactor found it more difficult
to recover from temperature changes than did the population of the
37ºC
reactor. This indicates that temperature regulation here is complex
and may depend on the composition of the initial sludge in the system.
Lau and Fang (1997) found that a temperature shock
had a less adverse effect on the acetotrophic methanogens than on
other methanogens. According to Cabirol et al. (2003),
who studied the adaptation of a mesophilic anaerobic sludge to thermophilic
conditions, this also showed a rapid adaptation with an increase in
the proportion of hydrogenotrophic methanogens.
We
have shown that the adverse effect of a temperature shift can be alleviated
by an initial lowering of the OLR. When this is followed by a slow
increase back to the initial OLR value the system can return to a
steady state that in some cases is not too different from the original
but at a different temperature. We strongly recommend the use of this
procedure in order to help microbial populations adapt to any temperature
shifts. Moreover, a continuous feed should be used to eliminate problems
that may arise from transient growth conditions and to permit flexibility
in adjustment of the time course of temperature shifts. It also can
be used to select a culture that will grow under conditions of stress.
Based
on these results, the operation of a 37ºC
reactor at an OLR of 10.74 g[COD]/L/day and the 55ºC reactor at an OLR of 12.15
g[COD]/L/day equivalent to an HRT of 7 days is likely to achieve satisfactory
results.
The
37ºC
reactor could tolerate temperature variations in the range of 37-43ºC
without significant changes in an index for process stability (TVFA
and TVFA/Alkalinity) whereas, the 55ºC
reactor could tolerate temperature variations in the range of 55-43ºC.
However, minor instabilities of the processes in terms of TVFA and
TVFA/alkalinity were observed when the temperature was changed.
The
first indication of a loss of stability of the processes, due to a
temperature shift, in both reactors was an accumulation of TVFAs.
This occurred at a temperature of 46ºC for the 55ºC reactor and at 40ºC for the 37ºC reactor.
The
instability could be overcome by lowering the OLR. After the stability
was regained the OLR could be gradually increased to that of the initial
value, without major changes to the stability.
AHMAD,
Abdul Latif; ISMAIL, Suzylawati and BHATIA, Subhash. Water recycling
from palm oil mill effluent (POME) using membrane technology. Desalination,
August 2003, vol. 157, no. 1-3, p. 87-95. [CrossRef]
AHN, J.-H. and FORSTER, C.F. The effect of temperature variations on
the performance of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic filters
treating a simulated papermill wastewater. Process Biochemistry,
January 2002, vol. 37, no. 6, p. 589-594. [CrossRef]
ANGELIDAKI,
I.; PETERSEN, S.P. and AHRING, B.K. Effects
of lipids on thermophilic anaerobic digestion and reduction of lipid
inhibition upon addition of bentonite. Applied Microbiology and
Biotechnology, July 1990, vol. 33, no. 4, p. 469-472. [CrossRef]
BANERJEE,
S. and BISWAS, G.K. Studies on biomethanation of distillery wastes
and its mathematical analysis. Chemical Engineering Journal,
September 2004, vol. 102, no. 2, p. 193-201. [CrossRef]
BJÖRNSSON,
L.; MATTIASSON, B. and HENRYSSON, T. Effects of support material
on the pattern of volatile fatty acid accumulation at overload in
anaerobic digestion of semi-solid waste. Applied Microbiology
and Biotechnology, June 1997, vol. 47, no. 6, p. 640-644. [CrossRef]
BJÖRNSSON,
L.; MURTO, M. and MATTIASSON, B. Evaluation of parameters for monitoring
an anaerobic co-digestion process. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,
December 2000, vol. 54, no. 6, p. 844-849. [CrossRef]
BORJA,
Rafael and BANKS, Charles J. Comparison of an anaerobic filter and
an anaerobic fluidized bed reactor treating palm oil mill effluent.
Process Biochemistry, 1995, vol. 30, no. 6, p. 511-521. [CrossRef]
BORJA,
R.; MARTÍN, A.; BANKS, C.J.; ALONSO, V. and CHICA, A. A kinetic
study of anaerobic digestion of olive mill wastewater at mesophilic
and thermophilic temperatures. Environmental Pollution, 1995,
vol. 88, no. 1, p. 13-18. [CrossRef]
BORJA,
Rafael; BANKS, Charles J. and SÁNCHEZ, Enrique. Anaerobic treatment
of palm oil mill effluent in a two-stage up-flow anaerobic sludge
blanket (UASB) system. Journal of Biotechnology, February
1996, vol. 45, no. 2, p. 125-135. [CrossRef]
BOUSKOVÁ,
A.; DOHÁNYOS, M.; SCHMIDT, J.E. and ANGELIDAKI, I. Strategies for
changing temperature from mesophilic to thermophilic conditions
in anaerobic CSTR reactors treating sewage sludge. Water Research,
April 2005, vol. 39, no. 8, p. 1481-1488. [CrossRef]
CABIROL,
N.; FERNÁNDEZ, F.J.; MENDOZA, L. and NOYOLA, A. Acclimation of mesophilic
anaerobic sludge to thermophilic conditions: PCR genera detection
methodology. Water Science and Technology, June 2003, vol.
48, no. 6, p. 81-86.
CAIL,
R.G. and BARFORD, J.P. Mesophilic semi-continuous anaerobic digestion
of palm oil mill effluent. Biomass, October 1985, vol. 7,
no. 4, p. 287-295. [CrossRef]
CHACHKHIANI,
M.; DABERT, P.; ABZIANIDZE, T.; PARTSKHALADZE, G.; TSIKLAURI, L.;
DUDAURI, T. and GODON, J.J. 16S rDNA characterization of bacterial
and archaeal communities during start-up of anaerobic thermophilic
digestion of cattle munure. Bioresource Technology, July
2004, vol. 93, no. 3, p. 227-232. [CrossRef]
CHEN,
Min. Adaptation of mesophilic anaerobic sewage fermentation populations
to thermophilic temperatures. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,
April 1983, vol. 45, no. 4, p. 1271-1276.
CIRNE,
D.G.; PALOUMET, X.; BJÖRNSSON, L.; ALVES, M.M. and MATTIASSON, B.
Anaerobic digestion of lipid-rich waste - Effects of lipid concentration.
Renewable Energy, May 2007, vol. 32, no. 6, p. 965-975. [CrossRef]
CLESCERL,
Lenore; GREENBERG, Arnold E. and EATON, Andrew D. Standard Methods
for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 20th
ed. Washington DC,
American Public Health Association, 1998. 1000 p. ISBN 0-875-53235-7.
DE
LA RUBIA, M.A.; PEREZ, M.; ROMERO, L.I. and SALES, D. Anaerobic
mesophilic and thermophilic municipal sludge digestion. Chemical
and Biochemical Engineering, 2002, vol. 16, no. 3, p. 119-124.
EL-MASHAD,
Hamed M.; ZEEMAN, Grietje; VAN LOON, Wilko K.P.; BOT, Gerard P.A.
and LETTINGA, Gatze. Effect of temperature and temperature fluctuation
on thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cattle manure. Bioresource
Technology, November 2004, vol. 95, no. 2, p. 191-201. [CrossRef]
ERGÜDER,
T.H.; TEZEL, U.; GÜVEN, E. and DEMIRER, G.N. Anaerobic biotransformation
and methane generation potential of cheese whey in batch and UASB
reactors. Waste Management, 2001, vol. 21, no. 7, p. 643-650.
[CrossRef]
GRIFFIN,
Matt E.; MCMAHON, Katherine D.; MACKIE, Roderick
I. and RASKIN, Lutgarde. Methanogenic
population dynamics during start-up of anaerobic digesters treating
municipal solid waste and biosolids. Biotechnology and Bioengineering,
February 1998, vol. 57, no. 3, p. 342-355. [CrossRef]
IRANPOUR,
O.; COX, H.H.J.; SHAO, Y.J.; MOGHADDAM, O.; KEARNEY, R.J.; DESHUSSES,
M.A.; STENSTROM, M.K. and AHRING, B.K. Changing mesophilic wastewater
sludge digestion into thermophilic operation at terminal island
treatment plant. Water Environment Research, September-October
2002, vol. 74, no. 5, p. 494-507. [CrossRef]
JENKINS,
S.R.; MORGAN, J.M. and SAWYER, C.L. Measuring anaerobic sludge digestion
and growth by a simple alkalimetric titration. Journal of the
Water Pollution Control Federation, May 1983, vol. 55, no. 5,
p. 448-453.
LAU,
Ivan W.C. and FANG, Herbert H.P. Effect of temperature shock to
thermophilic granules. Water Research, October 1997, vol.
31, no. 10, p. 2626-2632. [CrossRef]
NAJAFPOUR, G.D.; ZINATIZADEH, A.A.L.; MOHAMED, A.R.; Isa, M.H. and NASROLLAHZADEH, H. High-rate anaerobic digestion of palm oil mill effluent in an
upflow anaerobic sludge-fixed film bioreactor. Process Biochemistry,
February 2006, vol. 41, no. 2, p. 370-379. [CrossRef]
OSWAL,
N.; SARMA, P.M.; ZINJARDE, S.S. and PANT, A. Palm oil mill effluent
treatment by a tropical marine yeast. Bioresource Technology,
October 2002, vol. 85, no. 1, p. 35-37. [CrossRef]
PADILLA,
R.B. and BANKS, C.J. Thermophilic semi-continuous anaerobic treatment
of palm oil mill effluent. Biotechnology Letters, July 1993,
vol. 15, no. 7, p. 761-766. [CrossRef]
RAJ,
D.S.S. and ANJANEYULU, Y. Evaluation of biokinetic parameters for
pharmaceutical wastewaters using aerobic oxidation integrated with
chemical treatment. Process Biochemistry, January 2005, vol.
40, no. 1, p. 165-175. [CrossRef]
RITTMANN,
Bruce E. and MCCARTY, Perry L. Environmental Biotechnology: Principles
an Applications. New York, McGraw-Hill Book Co., 2001. 768 p.
ISBN 0-072-34553-5.
SONG,
Young-Chae; KWON, Sang-Jo and WOO, Jung-Hui. Mesophilic and thermophilic
temperature co-phase anaerobic digestion compared with single-stage
mesophilic-and thermophilic digestion of sewage sludge. Water
Research, April 2004, vol. 38, no. 7, p. 1653-1662. [CrossRef]
SPEECE,
R.E. Anaerobic Biotechnology for Industrial Wastewaters.
Nashville, Tennessee,
Archae Press, 1996. 416 p. ISBN 0-965-02260-9.
WHEATLEY,
A.D. Anaerobic Digestion: A Waste Treatment Technology. London,
Elsevier, 1990. 234 p. ISBN 1-851-66526-9.
YU,
Hang-Qing; FANG, Herbert H.P. and GU, Guo-Wei. Comparative performance
of mesophilic and thermophilic acidogenic upflow reactors. Process
Biochemistry, November 2002, vol. 38, no. 3, p. 447-454. [CrossRef]
ZINATIZADEH, A.A.L.; MOHAMED, A.R.; NAJAFPOUR, G.D.; ISA, M.H. and NASROLLAHZADEH, H. Kinetic evaluation of palm oil mill effluent digestion in a high
rate up-flow anaerobic sludge fixed film bioreactor. Process
Biochemistry, May 2006, vol. 41, no. 5, p. 1038-1046. [CrossRef]
|